2013 Purdue Cash Rent and Land Values Survey Results

This is sort of an "oops" post. I sent an e-mail to my mailing list when this came out a couple of weeks ago but neglected to post anything here.

The results of the 2013 Purdue Cash Rent and Land Values survey have been published at the following link:

Purdue Cash Rent and Land Values Survey

As a quick guide for Clinton County, Indiana landowners and tenants, the land values are on table 1, cash rents are on table 2 and Clinton County is in the central region of the state.

Farm Drainage Program Report

The Clinton County Extension Service with support from the Clinton County Farm Bureau and Clinton County Soil and Water Conservation District hosted a program on August 8, 2013, "Farm Drainage for the Environment and for Profit."

This was a good program and we had about 50 people in attendance in the morning and a few more popped in for the afternoon (when PARP credit was offered). As usual, I had to perform my duties as host so I only caught about half of the programs but I'll report on what I have notes on.

Jane Frankenberger from the Purdue Ag Engineering Department opened with, "Making Farm Drainage Decisions." I don't have a lot of notes from this one as I was still scrambling around but the two items I did jot down were that in a long-term study they've been doing at the Southeast Purdue Ag Center (SEPAC) in Jennings County tile drainage at 66' spacings had shown basically the same yield response as tile spaced at either 33' or 16'. Another practice she's been working on is called Drainage Water Management. This document explains this far better than I can but basically a structure is installed within the tile system where you can close off the flow of water out of the tile and conserve water for use in the field. The item I noted for this is that each structure can control water for about 2' of field slope from where it's installed. Within that area the long-term yield impact ranges from 5.8% to 9.8% depending on which study you look at.

Clinton County Surveyor Dan Sheets was up next with "Clinton County Drainage Permitting." Dan talked about how any time a farmer ties into a county drainage structure, either field tile or an open ditch, you need to contact the Surveyor's office BEFORE you start work on the project. There is a permitting process and fee which is not too much and far less than the fine (and costs of possibly having to redo the system) if you do work without getting one. The Surveyor's Office would like to be notified when you're doing the work so they can inspect where it outlets into the county system and also so they can GPS it. The key points I took away is that they want you to use sub-mains and not make too many outlets into the county system. The big message is that county drainage is a public utility owned by the taxpayers and needs to be treated like any other public system.

The next speaker was Justin Schneider, formerly Staff Attorney and now Director of Public Policy for Indiana Farm Bureau speaking on, "Legal Aspects of Farm Drainage." I'm going to leave this alone as I simply don't have the space here to fully discuss it but if you're interested in one perspective, you can take a look at this paper by Gerald Harrison of the Purdue Ag Economics Department.

After lunch Eileen Kladivko of the Purdue Agronomy Department spoke on, "Tile Drainage and Nitrogen Management." In contrast to every other presentation, I have a full page of notes for this one so I'll hit a few highlights. Much of this presentation focused on studies Eileen has been involved with at SEPAC for an extended period of time. First, Nitrate is not lost from the system in July-September. The vast majority of it is lost from November through May. It's important to note that this is different from studies done farther North. For example, in Minnesota 100% of Nitrogen is lost in April-June as before this the ground is frozen and no water flows through field tile. This is not the case most years in Indiana.

The key variable here is the amount of water which flows through the tile. The concentration of Nitrogen in the water is the same whether it's a wet or dry year, just that in wet years the quantity of water is much greater so more N is lost. Also, in recent years they've been experimenting with cover crops and fields with cover crops show a reduction of 5-20 lbs per acre per year over fields without. Studies in Iowa show that cover crops reduced Nitrogen loss from about 45 lb/ac/yr to about 18. So cover crops do seem to help conserve Nitrogen.

Ben Reinhart from the Clinton County SWCD and Kerry Smith from Howard County NRCS gave the final presentation, "Tillage and Conservation Cropping Systems for Drainage, Fertility and Weed Control." This was another presentation where I took very few notes however Kerry did some demonstrations showing how effective cover crops and no-till are at reducing erosion. Ben's discussion was on some of the practices such as no-till and cover crops which increase water holding capacity of soil and may reduce the need for drainage.

I may not have taken many notes for this session but I did get a nice picture of Kerry Smith and two assistants (one is Tom McKinney, I didn't catch the name of the other gentleman) demonstrating soil erosion differences between no-till and conventionally tilled fields.

The final presenter for the day was myself talking about Pesticide Drift (this was different from what was on the agenda). My main point was that I've been receiving a fair amount of drift complaints in the office this year and farmers need to be willing to talk to their non-farmer neighbors. If you aren't and something happens, instead of calling you about it, their call might be to the State Chemist's.

I have a page up on our Extension Office website which includes PDF's of some of the presentations. I encourage you to take a look at them when you get the chance. Thanks again to Farm Bureau and the SWCD for their sponsorship of the program.

Farm Drainage Program Page

August Clinton County Extension Ag Programs

I have three programs in the first half of August I'll provide a quick post about with a link to the flyers, for the first two anyway. I'll be making longer posts on these in the near future, either during a slow moment during the fair or afterwards.

Farm Drainage Program
On Thursday, August 8 we'll be having a Farm Drainage program, officially titled, Farm Drainage for the Environment and for Profit. We have some great speakers lined up for this program, which will run from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. The program is sponsored by the Clinton County Farm Bureau, Clinton County Soil and Water Conservation District and of course the Clinton County Extension Service. There is no cost to attend and lunch will be provided. Because we're serving a meal I need to have pre-registrations in by August 1. This program has been approved for Private Pesticide Recertification (PARP) credit. The following link is to the program flyer which includes additional information:

Farm Drainage for the Environment and for Profit

I will be sending letters out to all Private Applicators who need classes for recertification before their license expires.

Locally Grown Foods Tour
We're offering an exciting new program on Saturday, August 10. This will be the first Clinton County Locally Grown Foods Tour. During the day we will be visiting four sites in Clinton County which grow, raise and sell food products for the public. We have some pretty good variety with producers of produce, honey, meat products including pastured pork, and poultry and eggs. I will have much more information on this and am planning to put a website together in the near future. You can either participate in this by riding a bus through the day or driving yourself to as many sites as you like. Registration is $10 if you will be eating lunch and $20 if you will be eating lunch and riding the bus. A link to the program flyer which includes additional information is here:

Locally Grown Foods Tour

I should mention that two of the tour host sites have their own web sites, This Old Farm and The Farming Engineers.

Adult PQA Plus
The final program will be an Adult PQA Plus program on Tuesday, July 13 at 6:30 p.m. at the Extension Office, 1111 South Jackson Street in Frankfort. I will be offering both PQA Plus and Site Self-Assessment Training. There's no cost for this program. Some of you may have heard of changes to the PQA Plus program which includes a "test-out" opportunity. This is true but they've also revised the curriculum so you're only eligible for the online testing option once you've taken the new course in person.

I'll have more information on the first two of these in the near future. Don't forget that the Clinton County and 4-H Fair will be held July 14-20.

Indiana Farm Management Tour Summary

We had what I think was an excellent Indiana Farm Management Tour June 26 and 27. Of course I've never put one on before so I don't have much of a basis for comparison but all of the comments I've received have been positive (though I imagine people who hated it decided to keep their thoughts to themselves). We managed to keep things pretty much on time, the weather cooperated and most importantly, I think we had five very good host farms who had a fair level of diversity in how they go about their business and were able to communicate some of what they do and why they do it to the audience. Plus the food was very good.

As a quick review for those not familiar with the tour, each year the Purdue Ag Economics Department puts on an Indiana Farm Management Tour. This year was the 81st annual tour. The tour rotates around regions of the state and is hosted in one or two counties, with Clinton County hosting this year. Four or five farms are selected and two days are spent traveling to these farms. At each host farm Purdue Ag Economics Staff conduct a general interview with the farmer and his/her family and following this the audience breaks up into smaller groups and rotates around to what are called mini-tours which are short (15 minute or so) sessions where an aspect of that farming operation is discussed.

I'm about to set out to summarize this year's tour. As a qualifier, as host my number one job was making sure the tour ran, not that I could hear all of the presentations. I heard some and on some farms I was scrambling around taking care of something. I also want to mention that I had a ton of help. The Clinton County Pork Producers helped out a lot with sponsoring a lunch and moving tables and chairs around. Clinton County 4-H Junior Leaders served as the tour "crew" hauling a bunch of stuff around, helping with parking, handing out water, etc. And I had a lot of my fellow Extension Educators from other counties who helped with parking, as tour guides, and doing whatever needed to be done. The Purdue Ag Economics staff was great, in particular Alan Miller who was the overall Tour Director. 1 And of course the biggest thanks goes to our host farmers. This isn't the kind of thing you just agree to do. Facilities need to be cleaned up and prepped, presentations prepared, and there's a fair amount of media attention ahead of the event. Host farmers, their families and staff put a lot into this.

I could have found another 10 Clinton County Farms which would have made very good host sites. What I was looking for were operations where I knew the farmers had given some thought to how and why they made decisions and took their farms in the direction they had, and that they would be able to articulate this to an audience. I hoped - and I think succeeded - that there would be differences in the farms and how they went about doing things. It wouldn't be a very good tour with five farms where everyone had identical management systems, goals and objectives, decision-making processes, etc. And when selecting them, it obviously helped if it was someone I'd worked with before and that I was at least somewhat familiar with their operation. As we are a major pork producing county, I thought it was important to make sure this was included as well.

This year's Farm Tour Sites

With all of the preambles out of the way, let's get on with the summary. And even though it's a summary, this will be a pretty long post.

We opened the proceedings at Noon on Wednesday, June 26 at Hawley Farms with Jay and Sue Hawley. They operate a side business, Grandpa Jay's Pork and we were able to feature this with a pork picnic co-sponsored by the Clinton County Pork Producers and Indiana Pork. The main menu item was Grandpa Jay's porkburgers. I don't have an exact count but we had 240 chairs set up and some people were standing so I'd call it 250.

The lunch crowd at Hawley Farms

Hawley farms consists of 720 acres of cropland, mostly in corn and soybeans with a little bit of wheat. They also sell feeder pigs from 250 sows and raise some food grade corn and seed soybeans. A major component of the operation is Grandpa Jay's Pork. Jay and Sue process their cull sows and gilts to produce whole hog pork products. These products are for sale in some retail stores, they visit farmers markets and have a health department approved grill so they can serve porkburgers at various events, farmers markets, street vendor opportunities, etc. Jay can also be found traveling around with coolers delivering pork to customers when he can spare the time from the rest of the operation.

Jay and Sue Hawley with Purdue Ag Economist Chris Hurt

I didn't get to hear much of the interview or mini-tours. As might be expected at the first tour stop, I was scrambling around a bit trying to make sure things were set for the next two days. I know one of the mini-tours was a discussion of adding value to farm products and locally grown foods. Another was Josh Trenary from Indiana Pork and Jay discussing the importance of farmer involvement in public policy and taking local leadership roles. This is a topic that's near and dear to my heart and I was happy to see it included as part of the tour.

The second stop of the day was at Windy Lane Farms, operated by Ty and Hal Brown. Windy Lane Farms is a bit of a contrast to the day's first stop as they farm nearly 5300 acres in a corn and soybean rotation. Their soybeans are all grown as seed beans and 100% of their corn is non-GMO. They use conservation tillage on virtually all of their acreage and in 2013 expect to plant cover crops on about 4300 acres. In addition to the farm enterprise they are a Drago corn head dealership and are exploring becoming a dealer in tillage equipment.

The farm is intensively managed with a high emphasis on keeping track of costs and returns. They own and operate their own excavator to do land improvements with and have a great deal of grain storage and drying capacity. The mini-tours at this farm included; Ty talking about risk management, Hal discussing cover crops, a walking tour of an old hog barn they converted to a shop and their containment facility, and a tour of their office facilities.

Again, I didn't attend many of the mini-tours but I did listen to Hal Brown talk about cover crops. I've heard him speak several times. He does an excellent job and every time I learn something new. The Brown's have been working with cover crops for several years, experimenting with different mixes and have several which they use. Hal gave an excellent demonstration of how cover crops help reduce soil erosion and he gave a very interesting demonstration I hadn't seen before showing why they prefer 28% over Anhydrous Ammonia as Anhydrous has a tendency to remove carbon from the soil.

Hal Brown during his cover crops presentation

I didn't stay for the Master Farmer Banquet sponsored by Prairie Farmer and the Purdue School of Agriculture which was held in Brown's shop that night. The next morning we opened the tour at Neal farms, owned and operated by Gary and Larry Neal. Neal's farm approximately 6,000 acres in a corn-soybean rotation annually with about twice as much acreage in corn as in beans annually. Neal's have been early adopters of quite a few different practices and technologies. Two areas that stand out are in grain handling, drying and storage, and in upgrading their equipment. Their grain system can be controlled remotely through the farm's network and they are continually modifying equipment so one person can operate large machinery. They are also one of the few Clinton County farms to have an irrigation system on some of their acreage.

Gary and Larry Neal with Purdue Ag Economist Craig Dobbins during the general interview

Mini-tours at Neal's included a discussion of their grain system by Gary, their irrigation system by Larry, and a tour of their shop, including some of the modifications they've made to their equipment by Brandon Neal.

Brandon Neal (barely visible in the background) discussing Neal Farms' shop and equipment during a mini-tour

Stop number four was at Need Farms, owned and operated by Jeff and Kent Need. Actually they are the two primary owners but the entire family participates in the farming enterprise. 2 The Needs farm about 1500 acres in a corn-soybean rotation. The vast majority of their acres are farmed with continuous no-till and they have been experimenting with tillage radishes as a cover crop for several years. They use quite a bit of technology with their operation including GPS and auto-steer, an automatic scale on their grain auger cart and Jeff has started using an app with an iPad during planting.

Jeff Need discussing some of the technology used on the farm

The mini-tours here included; Brandy Daggett and Susannah Hinds from NRCS giving a soil health demonstration, Dave Need and Josh McCarty discussing cover crops, Kent Need talking about their automated grain auger cart, and Jeff gave a presentation on the technology used on the farm. Once again, I only heard all of the cover crops program though I was able to catch part of the soil health mini-tour.

Kent Need giving a mini-tour presentation on the farm's automated grain auger cart

The final tour stop was at Meadowlane Farms, operated by Mike and David Beard and Chris Pearson. We opened with lunch and hopefully everyone was OK with us serving pork at both meal stops, considering this is the main livestock enterprise in the county (though we do have a couple of large poultry operations as well). This operation consists of about 1900 acres of cropland in a corn-soybean rotation, with about twice as much corn planted as beans. They also contract finish about 33,000 hogs annually and David and Chris operate a commercial manure application business, Waste Application Services. The name of this is actually a bit of a misnomer as they manage their manure as a resource, not as a waste product, and try to help their clients do the same. They have adopted a risk management through diversification strategy with three enterprises and income sources; field crops, hogs and the manure application business. Most of their soybeans grown are seed beans, a common theme with this tour.

I've always appreciated Mike's involvement in the community and his dedication to educating others about agriculture. I've often taken local officials or high school students to his operation to help them learn the real story, or truth, about agriculture. Apparently Mike addressed this during the program. I'm sorry I missed that part of it.

Mike Beard discussing diversification strategies with Purdue Ag Economist Elizabeth Yeager

The Meadowlane farms mini-tours included; Mike discussing diversification strategies, David talking about the economics of manure application, Chris presenting on their manure application systems and equipment, and a discussion of their seed soybean production. I managed to hear both Chris and David. I didn't take a lot of notes but their application systems are designed to inject manure with minimum tillage and a figure David mentioned is that the nutrient value of their manure is five cents per gallon which got everyone's attention.

I haven't posted many audience shots but thought I would throw in this one of the people listening to Chris's presentation as you can see some of the equipment he talked about in the background. You can see about half of Chris on the left

That's my 2013 Indiana Farm Management Tour Wrap-up. We had a good two days, visited some great farm operations and the weather, while warm, was cooperative. I don't have numbers for the tour but we think we fed about 250 at Hawley's and 262 at Beard's (the caterers count better than us). I didn't know it at the time but after the tour, in addition to trying to find operations which had thought about why they do what they do and how they do it, two other themes became dominant. One was value-added. Most of the farms tried to add value to what they were doing, from growing crops for seed or as non-GMO's, to feeding grain to hogs. The other is diversification. Again, not universally but several of the farms had branched into multiple businesses ranging from selling food products to applying manure commercially to selling farm equipment. As margins tighten (does anyone think the last 3-4 years can continue indefinitely?) this is an option which farm families will likely explore even more. I apologize for not providing more details about the mini-tours. I didn't realize how few of these I attended until I was putting this post together.

In my opening to this post I mentioned that I had a lot of volunteer help in putting this on. I'll repeat that my greatest debt of gratitude goes to the host farmers. They helped make this an excellent tour and I hope they feel they got something beneficial from it too. I also want to thank those who provided financial support. The easiest way to do this is by posting one final picture. 3

Thank you to all of the 2013 Indiana Farm Management Tour Sponsors. I suppose I should add the standard disclaimer that this does not imply Purdue University's or Purdue Extension's endorsement of any of the products or services provided. However I very much appreciate their support

1 I found out when I opened the 2013 Indiana Farm Management Profiles book that my official title was, "Host Extension Educator & Local Arrangements Director." I've always had a theory, developed in college when being an "Assistant Animal Technician" meant I spent most of my time in a barn with a shovel, that the longer your title, the less important you actually are. ;)

2 I think it's important to note that all five of the farms on this tour are family farms. All five of the farms on this tour are also corporations. For those less familiar with ag who may come across this page, you sometimes hear people criticizing agriculture with terms like, "the vast majority of all farms are corporations." They're technically correct but this is because incorporating is important for tax purposes and insurance and liability reasons. This doesn't make them any less of a family farm. The vast majority of farms in Clinton County (and I'm pretty sure in Indiana and the US) are both family farms and corporations.

3 If you want to see more tour pictures, I've posted some on my Facebook page. I think this is set so the public can see them.

2013 Indiana Farm Management Tour

I apologize for not adding anything new in some time. I'm hoping to get back to more regular posting in the near future.

For those who aren't aware, Clinton County is hosting the 2013 Indiana Farm Management Tour. We have five excellent host farms. These represent a wide variety of Clinton County Agriculture. There is no cost to attend however you need to register so we have a meal count. For additional information on the tour and to register go to: The Purdue Ag Economics Department's Farm Tour Page.

2013 Central Indiana Pork Conference Report

I want to throw in a brief report about the 2013 Central Indiana Pork Conference held February 6. As I was the site host I did have to bounce around a bit from time to time, particularly in the morning, but I'll provide as much of a summary as I can. Also, pdf's of most of the presentations are up on the Clinton County Extension Office website.

Paul Clouser from Indiana Packers was the first presenter and this is the one I missed the most of. However I did catch a few items which caught my attention. First, they wanted to congratulate producers for helping them by providing higher quality animals to their plant. Since DDGS have become a substantial portion of swine rations Iodine Values and carcass quality have been a big industry issue and they had far less of a problem with this recently than they did a year or two ago.

He wanted to caution farmers on several aspects of production. One, which I intend to use in my PQA programs from now on, is that if you have a broken needle in an animal, euthanize it. My suggestion, so long as it meets all withdrawal standards, would be either to process it for your own use at home or send it to a processor and donate the meat to a food bank. However they don't want these animals at the plant. He also wanted farmers to be aware that as much of their business involves overseas markets, they should be aware of and follow IPC's corporate residue limits which in some cases are more stringent than US standards.

The Industry Outlook provided by Purdue Ag Economist Chris Hurt focused, unsurprisingly, on feed prices. He made the "official" prediction that US corn prices will experience the largest drop in history, $2.50 by next summer. Of course prices will still be above $5.00. He considers this to be a "sweet spot" where both grain farmers and pork producers should be able to turn a profit. Current stocks are short so this will be very weather-driven but he sees a good possibility of a long, slow decline with, if it looks like the crop is good, a rapid price drop in early July. With decent weather the next few years he thinks a long-term price outlook is for corn in the $5 range and soybeans around $11. With bad weather it's hard to tell where things might go. Another drought could drive corn over $10 and soybeans to $20. Ultimately, he believes that if the weather cooperates, the industry should see a return to profitability by the second quarter of 2013.

Brian Martin and Wes Lack from MP3 farms discussed a new sow unit they recently installed which uses an automated electronic feeding system and houses sows in groups rather than using gestation stalls. They provided a great deal of information on how the system works, how they train farm employees as well as gilts to use the system and other aspects which I won't detail here. They also operate an older sow unit which uses gestation stalls so they were able to provide some interesting comparative date over production in the two systems. Very briefly, while sow mortality is slightly higher with this system, overall performance of animals in the two systems has been very comparable when looking at areas such as pigs/sow/year and lbs/sow/year. One area which doesn't show up in the numbers is that they said the sows in this system are very easy to handle and work; very calm and easygoing.

I'll use their talk as a jumping-off point to editorialize a little. I've been at several programs recently including those sponsored by the National Pork Board and animal handling and housing is a prominent theme. Despite research which shows that sows get along fine in gestation stalls and other similar production-related issues, we live in a new age. At one time in this country, people were primarily worried about having enough to eat. They progressed from that to a concern over the quality of what they eat. Today many people are concerned with how animals are raised. In any business where you're producing a product for consumers, consumer preferences is a driver. Animal handling standards, housing systems, etc., should definitely be considered in animal operations. It's a basis for the Pork Quality Assurance (PQA Plus) program which almost all Pork Producers receive certification through. If I'm talking to a farmer who's considering building a new breeding/gestation/production unit, I would urge him or her to strongly consider a group housing system for sows. At this point I wouldn't advise spending a lot of money to convert an existing facility but for new construction I think farmers need to give it serious thought. The industry has been heading in this direction for some time now and I see no indication that this trend will stop.

Aflatoxin was a serious problem in corn this year and farmers know that this was a big issue in feeding hogs. Brian Richert from the Purdue Animal Sciences Department discussed issues related to this. A portion of this was related to levels at which hogs can tolerate Aflatoxin, strategies and methods of maintaining feed quality and preventing toxin development. I was more interested when he started talking about how some approved flowables - products added to grain to prevent clumping due to moisture - also can substantially mitigate the impacts of Aflatoxin in feed by serving as binders. In this area most farmers were able to blend feed enough to keep Aflatoxin levels down to acceptable levels but if you want to plan for a year where this may be next to impossible, Brian's presentation would be a very good starting point to start looking into these binders as another option.

This was a very good program. I was disappointed that numbers were down this year and will be looking at ways to bring this back up next year. For those who attended, thanks for coming and a big thank you goes out to the Rossville FFA Chapter who provided lunch.

Pesticide Applicator Recertification Program March 1

This is an update to something I posted a few weeks ago. The Clinton County Extension Office will be hosting a Pesticide Applicator Recertification Program on Friday, March 1 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the Clinton County Fairgrounds, 1701 South Jackson Street, in Frankfort.

The program schedule is as follows:

• 10:00 a.m. - Bill Johnson, Purdue Botany and Plant Pathology, "Weed Control Update"
• 10:45 a.m. - Christian Krupke, Purdue Entomology, "Insect Control Update"
• 11:30 a.m. - Curt Emanuel, Clinton County Extension Service, "Fertilizer Application Regulations"
• 12:30 p.m. - Registration and adjourn.

In addition to Private Applicator credit, 3 CCH's are available for Category 1 and RT, 1 CCH for Category 14 Commercial Applicators. There is a cost of $10.00 for Private Applicators taking the program.

I do not need pre-registration for this program, just for the Ag Outlook Breakfast if you're planning to attend that earlier in the day.

Clinton County Private Applicators will be receiving notification of this program in the mail within the next few days. The exception to this is if you have already completed your recertification requirements or if there's no way you can complete them; if you've taken no classes so far and your license expires at the end of 2013(you can only take 2 classes in a given year). To check your recertification status, go to the Purdue Private Applicator Page. On the menu bar to the left select, "Private Applicator Records" and enter the appropriate information into the search.

You do not need to be a pesticide applicator to attend this program. Anyone who has an interest in the topics is welcome to attend. In particular, if you have questions about the new Indiana Fertilizer Rule, I'd encourage you to make the last session.